Blogging Benedict: Chapter 1

I invite you as you read these posts to read the corresponding sections of the Rule of St Benedict. I will be quoting throughout the translation of Carolinne M. White, The Rule of Benedict, from Penguin (I used the £2 Little Black Penguin, but there is also a full-size edition). My friend Andrew has digitised another English translation available at Project Gutenberg.

St Benedict by Fra Angelico

In Chapter 1 of the Rule, Benedict lays out the different kinds of monks. What wisdom might we find for today here?

First, coenobites — monks who live in community — “are the most effective kind of monks” (p. 8). St Basil, who wrote his own monastic rules, was himself opposed to hermits. How can someone who lives alone fulfil the command of Christ to love others, to serve others? As Cassian observes, if you suffer the passion of anger, how will you ever overcome it if you never spend time with people to anger you?

For us — deep community matters. It can smooth our rough edges. It provides accountability. It gives a place to live out Christian virtues, to learn from others, to grow in grace.

Second, sarabaites. These are monks, so-called, if you will. I suspect (with no research into the question to back me up) that Benedict is taking a stab at aristocrats who claim to be ascetics but live on their villas with servi to take care of their needs. These people do not labour but rather live comfortably. Such as these are also a target of Cassian’s, and an example of what happens when people try to hold them to monastic strictness is in Gregory of Tours when there is a rebellion of aristocratic nuns.

Third, gyrovagues. Jerome and Cassian both oppose these as well. These are monks who just wander around from monastery to monastery. They have no stability. What they fail to realise is that perhaps the problem with all of the communities through which they drift is themselves — they bring their own problems with them wherever they go.

For us — this is a very Protestant phenomenon. Leaving one congregation or denomination for another whenever we disagree. Drums, preaching, music, the kind of ministry they do, how nice people are to us. What if we who leave were the problem in the first place?

The spirit that inspires these is the noon-day demon of akedia, I think. We become listless, despondent, discontented with our situation, our discipline, our community. We think that a change of scenery will help. Evagrius and Cassian deal with this, as does St Anselm in a letter quoted by Eadmer in the Life of St Anselm.

Fourth, hermits. Benedict himself, if we trust Gregory the Great, Dialogues 2, spent time as a hermit before becoming a coenobite. St John Climacus also spent time as a hermit. Because of what was said above about the virtues of coenobitism, one should only become a hermit after having grown much in grace. Cistercians have no place for hermits in their constitutions, much to the consternation of Thomas Merton, who so greatly desired that grace.

A thought on hermits: They are never alone. Indeed, the cloistered monks have a hard time keeping the world out. Even monks of La Grande Chartreuse (who are a community of hermits who never speak) have written books to minister to the world (I’m thinking of Guigo II, on whom I’ve blogged here and here). In Jerome’s Life of St Hilarion, the recurring theme is that Hilarion keeps getting found out everywhere he goes, and people come for spiritual wisdom and miracles, so the hermit moves along. Jerome attributes his discovery to demons who want to disturb his solitude. I like to think the opposite — God does not give people the fruits of contemplation to hoard them but to share them (see Gregory the Great, Book of Pastoral Rule on that one).

In John of Ephesus’ Lives of Eastern Saints, he tells the story of Simeon the Mountaineer, a hermit who went off into the mountainous regions of Mesopotamia (Assyria?) to be alone. There he met people who had been baptised but not catechised and who had no priests. Thus he found himself wrenched from the eremitical life into the life of active service, preaching to them and bringing them to a true faith in Jesus who saves them.

Consider Richard Rolle, a hermit who was also a spiritual adviser to some nuns and wrote several books. Or, also in the 14th century, Julian of Norwich, who received visitors at her anchorhold. And, today, Father Lazarus, the anchorite who inhabits the Inner Mountain of St Antony the Great. St Antony went there to be a hermit, and a community followed him that exists to this day. Father Lazarus lives there, alone with his demons and prayers and Nescafé, but he receives visitors and even makes videos for the Coptic Orthodox youth!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Blogging Benedict: Chapter 1

  1. I have always been both intrigued and disappointed with Chapter 1 of the Rule.

    The identity of the sarabaites is indeed not well defined. Your guess may be correct, but, if so, a lot of the pre-7th Century saints would come in for censure (I’m basing this observation on Alban Butler’s four volume work on the lives of saints).

    I am also uncertain of the nature of the gyrovagues to whom Benedict refers. He may be censuring those who flit from monastery to monastery, as you posit. But there are also other possibilities. One would be a class of mendicant akin to Buddhist monks, who live solely on alms and are rather aggressive in soliciting them. Since the Franciscan form of mendicants was a later phenomenon, I presume gyrovauges are not intended for such. There is a third class however, i.e., the leper monks. These had a tendency to move between leper hostels in various orders; If these are Benedict’s targets, I would not concur. The fourth possibility is an attack on Celtic monks performing a penance of peregrination, which, if the case, I would again dissent with Benedict.

    But the part that I find most distressing is what is NOT there. The definition of the coenobites is too vague. Do monks who live in coenobite community include only those who inhabit dedicated monasteries with specialized tasks and a hierarchical leadership. What about the “laura” monastic communities such as St. Martin of Tours founded, or as practiced by St. Sabas, or by many Irish monastic orders? Here each monk had his cell, but they shared a few common buildings for worship and eating; the concept of anam cara served to provide counsel. I don not know what Benedict thought of such monastic communities.

  2. Lauras are not coenobia, at least by anyone else’s definition of a coenobium. A coenobium, if we take our definition from Pachomius-Jerome, is where the monks truly live together in a community proper, unlike formal lauras such as St Sabas or the more loose anchorite communities as at Nitria and Sketis. Whether Benedict thinks they are all organised the way we today imagine them, who knows? But the common life, usually within the same enclosure, and typically headed by an abbot (St Pachomius, St John Climacus, et al.) is what defines a coenobium — koinos bios, common life.

    Benedict probably was unaware of how St Martin’s communities were organised, and it seems unlikely he knew of St Sabas yet, given that Sabas died in 532. But lauras are very important for eastern monasticism, especially that of St Sabas and then the Great Laura founded under Sabaite influence by St Athanasios on Mt Athos. I also doubt that central Italy knew much, if anything, of what was going on in Ireland before the arrival of St Columbanus in Gaul and northern Italy.

  3. […] When I blogged about Benedict, Rule ch. 1, I had forgotten that John Cassian (subject of my MA dissertation!) had also discussed the different kinds of monks (Greg Peters, The Story of Monasticism has reminded me). As you will recall, Benedict lists the four kinds of monks as coenobites, anchorites/hermits, sarabaites, and gyrovagues. He gets this from the Rule of the Master, and the Master (not a Timelord) gets it from Cassian about a century before. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.